<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spread the Word: Kinky is NOT a Diagnosis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magazine.goodvibes.com/2009/10/19/spread-the-word-kinky-is-not-a-diagnosis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magazine.goodvibes.com/2009/10/19/spread-the-word-kinky-is-not-a-diagnosis/</link>
	<description>Sex Blog and Erotica from Good Vibes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:38:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: lia</title>
		<link>http://magazine.goodvibes.com/2009/10/19/spread-the-word-kinky-is-not-a-diagnosis/comment-page-1/#comment-15277</link>
		<dc:creator>lia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magazine.goodvibes.com/?p=3053#comment-15277</guid>
		<description>clearly BDSM, consensual practices and cross-dressing are not pathological, are not &quot;diagnoses&quot; and should never have been construed as such.  however, i do lean towards the idea that some fetishes - those that imply non-consensual relations, such as bestiality, pedophilia, rapism, should still be included in the DSM.  it&#039;s a fine line, but i think that line can be drawn at the place where personal desire becomes violations of anothers&#039; boundaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clearly BDSM, consensual practices and cross-dressing are not pathological, are not &#8220;diagnoses&#8221; and should never have been construed as such.  however, i do lean towards the idea that some fetishes &#8211; those that imply non-consensual relations, such as bestiality, pedophilia, rapism, should still be included in the DSM.  it&#8217;s a fine line, but i think that line can be drawn at the place where personal desire becomes violations of anothers&#8217; boundaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Capp</title>
		<link>http://magazine.goodvibes.com/2009/10/19/spread-the-word-kinky-is-not-a-diagnosis/comment-page-1/#comment-15276</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Capp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magazine.goodvibes.com/?p=3053#comment-15276</guid>
		<description>This is only the beginning of the problems with DSM-V, which has seen regular defections and resignations of editors and researchers.  I have blogged about this a few times, including linking to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1425378?pageNumber=1&amp;verify=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article about unintended consequences&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;i&gt;Psychatric Times&lt;/i&gt;.  In short, while I wouldn&#039;t stop anyone from signing the petition, I wouldn&#039;t recommend holding your breath until the changes are made either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only the beginning of the problems with DSM-V, which has seen regular defections and resignations of editors and researchers.  I have blogged about this a few times, including linking to <a href="http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1425378?pageNumber=1&amp;verify=0" rel="nofollow">this article about unintended consequences</a> in <i>Psychatric Times</i>.  In short, while I wouldn&#8217;t stop anyone from signing the petition, I wouldn&#8217;t recommend holding your breath until the changes are made either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
